Humility

I have been wrong before and I have made mistakes. I will continue to make mistakes because I am human. No one, regardless of profession, should expect perfection out of themselves or the people around them I think humility is important as a teacher because you don't want to chide the students, taking on a "holier-than-thou" attitude which turns them off to whatever you are teaching.
Humility is the happy medium between having low expectations and expecting perfection out of yourself. While it is unhealthy to expect perfection from yourself and beat yourself up over mistakes, it is also unhealthy to have low or no expectations to yourself. Being humble means you have achieved a happy medium between perfectionism and apathy. Humility is doing your absolute best but being able to accept failure and admit that you are not perfect.
I admired teachers that were able to laugh at themselves when they said or did something silly on accident. I hope to be a teacher that easily admits when I am wrong, although that is sometimes hard to do.

Collaborativeness

There is a fine line between collaborative work and group work. In a perfect world, all group members would be dedicated to the outcome of a project equally, but in reality, some people care more than others. Instead, group work is usually the case. Group work is usually done by a small percentage of the group while the others contribute minimally and take credit for the outcome. People in group work are often motivated extrinsically by incentives such as a good grade or a prize of some sort.
True collaboration consists of a group of people who feel passionate about something and are working toward a common goal. These collaborators are intrinsically motivated and are contributing all they can to the group because they want to succeed. I think one of the main differences between collaboration and group work is the choice factor. Usually, people doing group work or cooperative learning have to choose topics within an assignment or topic. Collaboration occurs when people are physically and mentally present of their own accord.
I have been the victim of group work countless times...even at the college level. Admittedly, I am not always intrinsically motivated to complete a project and I do it for the grade, but I am still not willing to let the quality of the work suffer. There is some truth to the adage, "If you want something done right you gotta do it yourself." I usually end up doing most of the work.
The first time I was part of a collaboration was during this semester in my Contact Improvisation class. The dance affected us so much that our class has become a community of sorts and we hosted an all night jam (dance) last weekend. Although not everyone was able to make it, we worked together in class and outside of class to organize and plan the event. There was no grade riding on it, it was a suggestion thrown out by a student that my teacher agreed to, and it was fun. For the first time, I was involved in a collaborative activity and I found it much more meaningful than any group work I have ever done. In fact, I detest group work because I come out of the project feeling used. The problem is, kids have such varied interests that trying to do a collaborative project in a class would be almost impossible. There are bound to be people who are uninterested but they might be the only ones interested in that topic, leaving them no one to collaborate with. It work in Contact Improvisation because we all took the class because we wanted to. It isn't a required class. I speculate that most people in my high school Spanish classes will be there to satisfy a graduation or college entry requirement. Teachers cannot magically create intrinsically motivated kids in a subject they don't enjoy.

Efficacy

It certainly takes a lot of self-confidence to be a teacher. A teacher lacking in self-confidence will not be respected by their students because the students will not have confidence in the teacher's ability either. It is also difficult to respect a teacher who expects good work from you and yet fails to return tests and papers in a timely manner. The student-teacher relationship cannot be one-sided and hard work should be expected from both parties. Often, teachers who have a high work ethic provide a great example for kids.

Efficacy can be developed only through the way you react to situations. By training yourself to laugh at and learn from your mistakes instead of beating yourself up about them or becoming upset and giving up, you are training yourself to be persistent and confident in your ability to work through problems that you may not have been able to solve the first time. Self-awareness is extremely important in the profession of teaching. There were always those teachers, as we saw in "Chalk" that don't even know they're extremely boring or over-the-top and distracting. Being aware of your strengths and weaknesses as a person and as an educator can prevent you from making a fool of yourself and losing the respect of your students.

Inventiveness

Creativity and inventiveness are a huge part of why I decided to be a teacher. The teacher that inspired me to teach, Mr. Bonstetter, was always using out-of-the box ways to get us to remember Spanish verbs and grammar rules. He used cooking projects, arts and crafts, actions, and songs and chants to help us remember what we needed to know. But, like all of my other classes, he never answered the "why" question. Why is this important? Why should I learn this?

Sir Ken Robinson criticizes the education system in his speech, claiming that it squashes creativity which should hold equal importance with literacy. He defines creativity as "original ideas that have value" and likened education systems worldwide to strip mines that mine only for what they want: in this case intelligence that will allow kids to get a "real" job. He describes this as "educating people out of their creative capacities." He questions why dance is not a part of formal education, and he questions the people that decided what was and was not important. He realizes that due to the ever-changing world, creativity is something that needs to be fostered and encouraged to allow for future generations that can come up with solutions to problems and use their creativity instead of squashing it with logic.

One of the things he said really struck me. He said, "If you're not prepared to be wrong, you will never come up with anything original." This reinforces the idea that learning is inherently messy and creative. I am always terrified of making mistakes, because I have been taught that mistakes are a result of a personal failure. In his speech, Sir Ken Robinson redefines intelligence as diverse, dynamic, and distinct. As much as we would like to think it does, the American education system does not allow for or encourage diverse learners. Those who are kinestetic learners like the dancer he described are labeled as ADD or ADHD and treated for something that should be encouraged.

I think it really took this speech for me to realize how incredibly flawed formal education is. I've joked with my friends that when we were kids we were told that we could be anything we want to be and now we realize that that old adage is complete bull. What they were really saying was, "You can be anything you want to be as long as it will get you a steady job." Slowly, the system pushes people toward "reasonable" jobs like math, science, and languages. We coin phrases like "starving artist," implying that artists cannot be taken seriously for trying to turn a hobby into a career. But who decided that art can only be a hobby? That dance is only for those with the right body? Creativity is not valued in the American school system, yet it is valued in society. People praise historical figures for thinking outside of the box, but people exiting the school system are equipped only with facts and not the ability to think creatively and inventively.

End rant.